tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420261084924510806.post7139993638775724856..comments2023-03-14T08:16:13.845-04:00Comments on Deep Thoughts - Richie Castellano: Copyright ThoughtsRichie Castellanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11314596555638614583noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420261084924510806.post-48131137819059583442015-04-22T15:54:05.483-04:002015-04-22T15:54:05.483-04:00Good pointsGood pointsRichie Castellanohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11314596555638614583noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2420261084924510806.post-23958539911135464962015-03-11T20:08:49.129-04:002015-03-11T20:08:49.129-04:00The inherent flaw in copyright law is that it assu...The inherent flaw in copyright law is that it assumes that *notes belong to people*, and they are making money off it. And as I'm sure you already know, there's only a certain amount of chords/melodies/ that are possible within a scale or key or time signature. And as far as production, arrangement and orchestration being "copyrighted", I think that's an equally interpretative game. Could one musician with the right tools make a recording that "sounds" like another one? Of course they could. Would there be a copyright infringement? Maybe, if both people were making money off their "sounds". Of course, this has nothing to do with the reason that people are inspired to make music without a profit. It has everything to do with people who make money off of it. Musicians/composers/producers have been ripping each other off for centuries. It's only an issue because of money, which has really nothing to do with the reason that people create music because of inspiration. Just my 2 cents, no need to respond.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12966303083558288868noreply@blogger.com