Why Batman V Superman is really a battle of Fans V Critics. Spoiler: The fans won.

Last night I recorded an episode for my podcast, Band Geek.  My wife and I were joined by 4 of our friends in my home studio.  Our mission: to give our review of Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice.  I knew most of us liked the movie in general, but I was expecting there to be a good deal of debate.  We were down there for 3 hours!  However, this 3 hours wasn't spent arguing casting choices, or discussing what the movie was missing.  Instead, we went through every major plot point and screamed at each other like little girls in excitement.  Just the mere re-telling of the events of this movie gave us all goose bumps and nerd boners.  We were all tired, we wanted to wrap things up, but we couldn't. We were having too much fun re-living the experience of being in that theater.

Back in April of 2015, my buddy Ray told us that they'd be showing the new trailer for Batman V Superman (BvS) in an IMAX theater 45 minutes away in New Jersey. So my friends and I piled in a car and drove out there to watch 1 minute of film on a giant screen. Were there better ways to spend our time? Sure, but this was a lot of fun. To reward us for our geekdom, director Zack Snyder appeared on screen and informed us that everyone in attendance would be rewarded with FREE advanced IMAX screening tickets. What a great way to treat your fans!

When the movie was released last week, Zack made good on his promise. My friends and I, joined by several other mega fans wearing their Batman, Superman, or Wonder Woman merch assembled in the IMAX theater 3 days before the movie was released.  We were collectively blown away.  The look on everyone's face was that of supreme satisfaction, like they just ate a giant Thanksgiving dinner.  As we sat there in our seats, unable to move, we all agreed, "they finally got it right.  Marvel people are going to shit all over this."

Before I really go into it, let me explain how I feel about Marvel movies, specifically Marvel studios movies.  I really like them.  My favorites include The Avengers, Guardians of the Galaxy, Winter Soldier, and Iron Man.  I don't really want to discuss Marvel movies in this post, but since everyone else feels compelled to draw comparisons, I can't avoid it.  Marvel studios movies are great.  They're filled with visual spectacles, lighthearted fun moments, characters cracking jokes at each other and of course Scarlett Johansson in a skin-tight suit flipping her body around thugs as she kung fus the crap out of them. I enjoy all of it.  Marvel's universe building technique has proven incredibly effective, with every movie revealing a small piece of the big picture. I totally dig all of it.  However, while watching the Avengers together on screen, at no point did I ever think, "This is exactly what DC should be doing."  Sure I wanted to see the Justice League assembled on screen, but I didn't want them to do anything lighthearted, and this is at the core of the split between Hollywood and the fans.

If you haven't heard by now, BvS has received some of the worst possible reviews from critics and even nerd culture ambassadors like Kevin Smith aren't thrilled with it.  However, this movie is tremendously successful at the box office and it hasn't even been out for longer than a week. How did this happen?

When I started seeing all the negativity emerge, I couldn't believe it. Did these people see the same movie I saw?  How could anyone give this a 28%? When I started reading what these people were saying I started to doubt my own opinions.  It really soured my whole experience. I left that theater flying high, but when the reviews came out the next day I was completely deflated.  But then I went to twitter and searched #BatmanVSuperman.  What I saw restored my hope. Sure, there were plenty of people with Thor profile pictures who clearly hadn't seen the movie yet tweeting about how awful it was, but the amazing thing was the amount of fans who gathered around this movie and defended it from the onslaught.  Fans V Critics was on.  Sure, critics have their platforms in newspapers and popular websites, but fans have money, and using our money, we've already won this battle.

Poor critical performance can hurt a franchise, but like Superman, Zack Snyder's franchise is bulletproof. While the critics are using their snarky reviews to tear down Man of Steel and BvS, Warner Brothers is going ahead with TEN more DC Universe movies.  That's right...TEN!  Will they all be panned by critics and Marvel fanboys?  Probably. Will they all make bank?  Probably.

Fans V Critics is really a matter of how nerd culture is perceived by Hollywood. When I say Hollywood, I don't mean only filmmakers, but the entire industry including executives, media publications and critics.  Nerd culture is hot right now.  Video games are a huge industry, Star Wars is back in full force, one of the most popular sitcoms is the Big Bang Theory, and I can watch a different superhero show every night of the week.  Hollywood has found serious money in the pockets of nerds.  They've also managed to make some our favorite things mainstream.  People who don't get any of the deeper references can still enjoy an episode of Big Bang Theory, or get a few chuckles out of Guardians of the Galaxy.  I think all of this is great.  And no, I don't think my favorite indie band has "Sold Out."  As far as I'm concerned, the more content in this genre, the better.

So if everyone is going nuts for nerd content, why are we getting a backlash on BvS?

When I read a DC comic, specifically Batman, I'm not transported to a bright and shiny place where lighthearted humor is strategically placed between large action sequences.  I'm in the shit.  Batman: The Animated Series actor Kevin Conroy's voice is in my head conveying that the weight of this bleak and hopeless world is on the shoulders of a man with no meta human abilities. He's cruel, he's brutal and we love it. 

Meanwhile Superman has all of these wonderful abilities, but he's still tortured.  He can't save everyone, people are afraid of what he can do, and he'll never have a normal life with the woman he loves. In recent versions of the comic he becomes so alienated that he simply walks through America looking for meaning in what he does.  Bleak... and we love it.

No disrespect to Lynda Carter, but Wonder Woman is not American in the comics. She doesn't have the accent of a person born in Arizona.  She's from a hidden island which presumably exists somewhere in the Mediterranean.  She has fought Gods and she has fought men. She is a warrior. She punches first and asks questions later.  We love it.

This is the disconnect that we're seeing with BvS. While the non-nerd population thinks all comics fans are reading funny papers, we're actually reading serious stories. We enjoy the mass appeal of the Avengers and Guardians of the Galaxy, but when we turn off the movies we re-read our copies of The Killing Joke, The Dark Knight Returns, Kingdom Come, Identity Crisis, Flashpoint, etc.  None of this is lighthearted reading. In fact, it's borderline depressing...but we love it.

Seeing how popular the Marvel Studios movies are, I think a lot of us assumed we'd never get to see the "real" versions of these DC characters on the big screen.  I don't think we expected Batman to dance around at a crime scene while listening to "Come and Get Your Love," but we always knew we'd be getting some watered down version of the characters.

We were wrong.

With BvS, Zack Snyder showed that he is one of us.  He reads these dark comics and agrees, this is what these characters should be.  Could he have done a lighter version? Sure, but instead he gave the fans exactly what they wanted.

Ben Affleck is perfection as both Bruce Wayne and Batman. I feel like I have to thank Zack Snyder for proving most of us wrong in this department. Watching Ben Affleck move across the screen in his hulking frame and incredible costumes makes me feel like I'm playing the Arkham video games and that's a very good thing.  There's a complaint about Batman killing in this movie.  I admit that this seemed to be an odd choice, but it's not a new choice.  Even though Batman has a famous "no-killing policy," the death toll has been piling up since 1989's Batman movie.  Watch it again and tell me no one dies when he fires machine guns into a parade from the seat of the bat-wing.  In the Nolan trilogy, Batman even talks about his no killing policy, but then kills dozens off people.

While they don't come out and say "Batman kills" in this movie, they do address that in his older years he's become increasingly cruel after 20 years in Gotham and has been pushed over the edge by the catastrophe in Metropolis.  I can nerd-splain away all these issues, saying maybe these people are just unconscious and that batman uses rubber bullets in his vehicular weapons, but it's really not a huge point worth harping on.

Let's talk about one of the biggest attractions of this movie, Wonder Woman! While I was one of the people who thought Gal Gadot might have been a bit too slender to play Wonder Woman. That thought did not once cross my mind while watching this movie.  She owned the part.  I LOVE the accent.  That's how it always should have been.  I can't wait to see her upcoming solo film.

Jeremy Irons was a really cool choice for Alfred.  There's a shift going on in the comics and in the Gotham TV show making Alfred a bit more of a bad-ass and I'm way on board for this.

Henry Cavill remains to be my favorite Superman.  I realize he's very different from some of the classic interpretations but luckily we have 4 Christopher Reeves movies and 4 seasons of Lois & Clark to revisit for that version if you're feeling nostalgic.

Jessie Eisenberg delivered an unorthodox Lex Luthor performance.  I probably would have preferred something closer to the Clancy Brown version of the character, but I found this younger internet-era version to work really well for the movie.

Amy Addams remains to be the one casting choice I'm not totally into.  I think she's a terrific actress, and she's fine in this movie, but it just seems like an odd choice.  I guess I just always want Teri Hatcher to be Lois Lane.

I don't want to go too much into the entire cast, but I also enjoyed the performances of Laurence Fishburne, Diane Lane and Holly Hunter.

One major complaint of this movie was its length and pacing.  I agree to a point, but as a lover of classic Japanese films, this was nothing new to me.  One of my favorite films, Samurai Rebellion, is 90% talking. The main character gets pushed and pushed to his limits until the last 10 minutes of the movie where he unleashes a bloody assault on all of his enemies.  I felt BvS had a similar framework, but I would have preferred a few more action sequences to break things up.

Speaking of action sequences, this is by far the best superhero action I've ever seen on screen.  The two standouts for me are the rescue scene which is straight out of the Arkham video games and the DC trinity scene which had the entire theater applauding.  After watching this movie, it's hard to not want a grappling gun of your own.

Another complaint is the use of dream sequences. While I didn't necessarily love these parts, I think it's foolish to judge them at this point.  I have a feeling these scenes are going to connect to future movies in a significant way, especially the "Am I too soon?" dream.

Being a musician I'd be remiss if I didn't mention the score.  Hans Zimmer and Junkie XL have delivered a fittingly epic musical accompaniment to this movie.  I bought the soundtrack right away and have been listening to it non-stop.  My favorites are "The Red Capes are Coming" and "The Wonder Woman Theme."  It's in 7/8!  Awesome!

One term I'm seeing quite a bit is that this movie has a "lack of fun."  I find this sentiment particularly irksome.  The characters in this movie are not having fun.  It's a serious story where people do seriously twisted and psychotic acts.  Again, this isn't Guardians of the Galaxy and it absolutely should not be.  Batman's world is broken.  In the comics, people do horrendously awful things, and I'm not just talking about obscure comics, I mean the big ones.  For example: In Killing Joke, the Joker beats a young woman with crowbar and paralyzes her for life.  This is not fun to read, it's horrifying, but this is a hugely successful comic book.  A lighthearted, fun movie taking place in this world does a disservice to the source material and to the fans who love it.  Even though there are many brutal moments in this movie, it doesn't mean I was appalled or depressed while watching it.  I was having....(wait for it)....FUN.  Why? Because someone cared enough to bring the demented world of DC comics to life without filtering it or watering it down.  I was in awe.

Another thing to consider is that Zack Snyder had an awful lot of setup to do in this movie and I think he handled it rather well.  Especially the way he reveals the other Meta-Humans.  Again, people were cheering at the screen.  I think it's a safe bet to assume that once the Justice League is established, these characters will get a littler more chummy and perhaps we'll see some lighter and friendly banter between them.  But for where we are in the overall story, BvS is exactly what it needs to be.  This universe is dark and hopeless and the only way to fix it is for its heroes to unite.  I can't wait!

Richie Castellano is a professional musician and producer.  He also reads comics, builds lightsabers and hosts a riotcast show called Band Geek.  When he's not being a geek he plays guitar and keyboards in Blue Oyster Cult.

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

No, not Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens, just "The Force Awakens."

Once again, I find myself in the minority of Star Wars fans.  I'm super stoked about a new movie coming out, but I find Disney's marketing campaign to be really tacky.  (Although on a sub-conscious level, maybe I'm just pissed at them for cancelling Tron 3.)

As I've stated many times before, I don't hate the prequels at all.  No, they didn't recapture what it felt like to see Star Wars as a 5 year old boy, but I thought they stood just fine on their own.  In fact, I like some of the stuff in the prequels better than the some of the stuff in the originals (blasphemy!!)

In case you were wondering, here is MY ranking of all 6 currently available Star Wars movies:

1. Revenge of the Sith
2. Empire Strikes Back
3. A New Hope
4. Attack of the Clones
5. Return of the Jedi
6. Phantom Menace

Feel free to flame me for this in the comments.  No I don't hate Return of the Jedi, I just like the other ones more.  Personal preference.  And, even though I know Phantom Menace has a ton of problems, I love Qui Gon and Darth Maul, so I'll still watch it just to see those two awesome characters go at it.

The Force Awakens is projected to earn 2 BILLION dollars!  That's really incredible that in 2015 a franchise started in the 70s is still so relevant.  Yes, Disney is really pouring it on with the promotional material and the toys.  They definitely know what they're doing.  But the thing that I find annoying is how they're not-so-subtly distancing themselves from the prequels.  If you don't know what I mean, check out this video:

Star Wars: The Force Awakens - Comic-Con 2015 Reel

"Real Sets. Practical Effects"  Blah Blah Blah.  To my overly sensitive ears, this is a blatant attack on the prequels.  The more I hear about this movie, the more I get aggravated by this theme.

SPOILERS

So I read somewhere that this black wearing, red lightsaber wielding guy, Kylo Ren, isn't a sith in this movie.  Why not?  Because Sith is a prequel word.

JJ Abrams said no mention of midichlorians will be made.  Because midichlorian is a prequel word.

Even the lack of an episode number shows the blatant distancing of this movie from the Lucas movies.  It just annoys me. 

There are several other fans that feel the same way as me.  I've read several other blog posts echoing my sentiments.

hate-casual-awakening-the-prequel-shadethrower

star-wars-episode-7-force-awakens-spoilers-analysis-why-marginalizing

Even though this weird marketing tactic is irritating me I'm still excited for the Force Awakens.  I guess there is some validity to Disney's pandering to the cry-baby prequel haters.  They're trying to win back the incredibly small percentage of people who actually will consider skipping The Force Awakens because of their prequel hatred.  All of the prequel lovers will go see The Force Awakens regardless of how much Disney insults our taste.

On December 18th, I will going into the theater to see The Force Awakens with an open mind.

With that being said, here are my list of demands:

1. Luke MUST be the main character of this film.

2. We MUST see Luke do awesome "prequel-worthy" Jedi feats and not the lame original trilogy stunts.

3. Yoda MUST appear as a blue glowie to advise Luke,

4. Liam Neesons MUST appear as a blue glowie to advise Yoda.

5. George Lucas MUST appear as a blue glowie to advise JJ Abrams.

6. We MUST see 58 year old Carrie Fisher in a metal bikini.

7.  Leia MUST use the force.

8. JJ MUST explain why having those incredibly dumb looking crossguards on that dumb looking lightsaber is neccessary

9. Han Solo MUST survive through this movie.  

10. Boba Fett is dead and will remain that way,

11.  Lando

Like I said, I'm going into this movie with an open mind.  But if all of my simple demands are not met, this will go below Phantom Menace on my list.

Grant Morrison's Wonder Woman comments

Nerd Post:

I have a tremendous amount of respect for Grant Morrison.  I don't always love everything he does, but there's no denying his genius.  He has a way of presenting classic characters in new and interesting perspectives.  Some of these characters are over 70 years old, so evolution is a necessity. However, his recent comments about Zack Snyder version of Wonder Woman really annoyed me.

According to Mr. Morrison, the warrior princess iteration of the Wonder Woman character is not what the original creator, William Moulton Marston envisioned for his character. This may be true, but who cares?!?  This character is 73 years old.  Of course it's going to go through several interpretations.  If Wonder Woman stayed exactly the same this whole time, people would lose interest.

Based on a nearly 4 minute trailer in which Gal Gadot appears as Wonder Woman for a total of 1 and a half seconds, Grant Morrison has decided that this version of the character is going to be too much of a stretch from the original creator's vision.  If you don't believe me, go back and watch the trailer again:

https://youtu.be/0WWzgGyAH6Y

She appears in the costume for less than 2 seconds!

Now, I don't know if Mr. Morrison has access to more info than the general public, but if this is the basis for his hypothesis, then it's pretty silly.

But even if he is correct in assuming that this version of the character will be all about busting skulls and kicking ass, is that so bad?  Wonder Woman was sucking wind for a very long time until New 52 creators, Brian Azzarello and Cliff Chiang made a few tweaks and saved her from obscurity.  Their interpretation is probably the best thing to happen to the character since the animated Justice League series.  If you like Wonder Woman, and haven't read their run, I highly recommend it.

SPOILER ALERT*****

In this New 52 Version, they play up the Greek Mythology end of things with Wonder Woman being a demigod.  It's revealed that the whole "you were formed from clay" story is a lie.  Her mother, Hippolyta, was impregnated by Zeus, and desperately wanted to keep it a secret, so she concocted this clay story.  When Diana (Wonder Woman) finds out about this, she is forced to deal with her half brothers and sisters on mount Olympus as she is drawn into their petty power plays. This is a particularly bloody and violent interpretation of the character, and I think that played no small part in the series' success.  At one point she even becomes the God of War, and it's awesome!

So, Grant Morrison, who's made a career of looking at characters from different angles, thinks this version is too far from the original creation.  Again, I love Grant Morrison.  I've bought a lot of his work, but I 'm calling shenanigans on this.

Grant Morrison is coming out with his own Wonder Woman book.  I'm very excited to read it and I'm sure it will be awesome.  His version of the character is supposed to be in line with the original version.  I think that his comments about the Zack Snyder version of the character (of which we've only seen 1.5 seconds) are nothing more than a promotional tactic.  Every comics blog posted about him, and here I am writing about them, so obviously the guy knows what he's doing.  So even though Grant Morrison may be the greatest comics genius of our time, he's not above using cheap promotional tactics to sell books.  In fact, this was my big problem with his recent Multiversity series.  It felt like a sales pitch to me.

Things that don't evolve eventually become extinct.  Look at how many different interpretations of Batman there are.  This constant re-interpretation is what makes the character relevant year after year. Because we live in a time where everything is preserved, you can stick with your favorite version!  If you hate Christian Bale, you can pull up the Michael Keaton version on Netflix!  Think Keaton is too dark?  Well, the Adam West episodes have all been digitally restored!  Is Adam West too corny?  Well, then pickup the animated series and experience Kevin Conroy's performance.  We have options!

Zach Snyder is carrying the torch on this characters.  He is re-imagining them for new generation.  As anazing as the Lynda Carter Wonder Woman was, you can't have that kind of character in a serious comic book movie in 2015.  The character has to evolve.  Look what happened when Bryan Singer tried to re-do the Christopher Reeves Superman in 2006.  It was a horrible bomb.  The character has to evolve.

If you prefer Lynda Carter to Gal Gadot, or Christopher Reeves to Henry Cavil or Michael Keaton to Ben Affleck, then guess what?  All of those videos are easily accessible.  Knock yourself out. They're all great.  There's also a possibility that we will see more traditional interpretations of these characters on the big screen in the future.  But for now, Zack Snyder's version is what these characters need to keep them alive in 2016 and beyond.

What A Great Time To Be A Fanboy

Last week was a great geek-week.  We got a new Star Wars trailer, a Batman V Superman Teaser, and a Battlefront 3 Trailer.  I'm super excited about all of the comic book, sci fi and fantasy games and movies on the horizon.  I'm even excited to go see Fantastic Four, which doesn't look promising based on the trailers, but it's a comic book movie and I'll happily pay my $15 to go enjoy it.

I'm also eagerly awaiting Avengers 2 which comes out soon.  I really like all those Marvel Studios movies.  The movie I'm most excited about, though, is Batman V Superman.  I'm a big fan of Zack Snyder's style and I definitely lean toward DC in my fanboy tendencies.  I think seeing the 3 biggest superheroes of all time share the screen will be an epic event.  If Snyder puts the same love into BvS as he did in making a panel by panel recreation of Watchmen, this will be truly incredible.

I know some people didn't care for Man of Steel, but I loved it.  I also though Bryan Singer painted Superman films into a corner with his sub-par take on the character.  Zack Snyder played the only hand he could, which was to distance himself from Christopher Reeves and Bryan Singer as much as possible.  The result was a dark, violent and sort of tragic movie with heaping portions of Superman whoop-ass.  I absolutely loved the Russel Crowe sequences on Krypton.  I thought Michael Shannon's off-beat Zod was great, and the epic battle at the end was incredible.  To the people who complain about the collateral damage in that movie, I say this....It's a movie!!!  I want to see stuff get blown up!   And I have a feeling that there will be repercussions for Superman's recklessness in the movies to follow, so don't get your panties in a bunch just yet. 

I'm also hearing a lot of people say that BvS is going to suck...after only seeing a teaser.  This is really silly.  Why would you want a movie to suck when you know you're going to pay to see it? From what I've seen so far, I'm very satisfied.  It looks like Snyder is really bringing Frank Miller's Dark Knight into the real world.  Affleck looks totally jacked in that batsuit.  And his anti-Superman suit looks like it walked right off the pages of Miller's Dark Knight Returns.  I even went to that special IMAX trailer screening just to see 4 seconds of extra footage....and it was awesome.

On the TV end of things, Arrow and Flash continue to crush.  I'm really enjoying their shared universe.  Gotham is still finding its footing.  I'm not 100% in yet, but I'm finding more things to like about it.  I'm even enjoying some Marvel shows.  Agent Carter was an excellent mini-series which I highly recommend.  I'm also a few episodes into Daredevil which is also really good.

Basically, were at the point where you can watch new superhero content every night of the week.  How cool is that?

I haven't had much time for gaming lately with my work/podcast schedule, but I continue to sneak in Artemis sessions with my friends.  That game is really amazing and if you're a Star Trek fan, you owe it to yourself to get 5 friends together and try it.  It's cheap, fun and excellent.   It can be a little glitchy at times since it's  designed to work on many different devices, but the occasional restarts are a small price to pay for the amount of joy this game creates.

My wife is back into Diablo III.  She's playing with my friends and I maintain that that's the best multiplayer console game ever.  It's so easy to jump in and out of games with your friends which is so important.  I think every game should be like that.

I'm looking forward to Arkham Knight and Battlefront 3 as I mentioned earlier. I'm really hoping Battlefront 3 offers that persistent ground to space transition that was rumored in the early development stages.  We'll see.

Meanwhile there are a couple of crowd-funded games that have caught my attention.  Elite Dangerous and Star Citizen both look like tons of fun.  I haven't had the chance to play them yet, but I have been watching other people play on twitch.  Twitch is a great streaming service for spectating video games.  It sounds like a silly concept, but I really like it.  It's a great way to really see what a game is like before spending any money on it.

So now that the geek stuff is out of the way, I have a busy musical schedule coming.  After a month off, Blue Oyster Cult is back on the road with plenty of shows coming up.  I'm also doing a solo show opening for Eddie Money on May 31st at the St. George Theater in Staten Island. NY.  I'm very excited about that.

We also have some great stuff coming up on my Band Geek podcast.  If you haven't seen our ridiculous Michael McDonald video, please check that out here: https://youtu.be/Fu5XXkn6exo

To subscribe to Band Geek, go to www.riotcast,com/bandgeek

-Richie

Copyright Thoughts

Here are my thoughts on the Robin Thicke thing.

The way I was taught copyright law, you're only violating copyright if you use the same words or melody.  That's really all you can own in a song.  In the case of Sam Smith and Tom Petty, it's clear cut copyright infringement.  This example is not, because the melodies of the Robin Thicke song and the Marvin Gaye song are totally different.

However, I think this case goes beyond a simple copyright dispute.  From my understanding, you are also allowed to own the contents of a recording.  This is why it is illegal to use samples of other people's records in your music without their permission.

But again, this is not the case here. Blurred Lines doesn't use any samples from Got To Give It Up.

So what is the deal here?  If according to copyright law, you can only own words and melody, then that leaves all the other musical contributions in a song up for grabs.  This is because the copyright law is an outdated law written at the birth of published music. Since sheet music only contained words and melody, the right to copy that sheet music only protected words and melody.

So even though Blurred Lines doesn't copy melody or lyrics, when many people hear it, they immediately think "this sounds like Got To Give It Up."  This poses an interesting problem. Should production, arrangement and accompaniment ideas be something you can own?  As someone who does both these things for a living, I'd say yes.  But this is a tough thing to judge.

For example, Stacy's Mom copies a production genre.  So should that be illegal?  I don't think so.  In that case, Stacey's Mom sounds like a Cars song, but not a specific cars song.  It's not overtly using the same groove, or chord progressions, but it's definitely trying to sound like a song the Cars would record.

Blurred Lines, copies a specific song so I think they're asking for trouble.

I don't think Robin Thicke did anything wrong under the Copyright laws as I understand them.  But I do think it's time to revisit these laws and create more specific language regarding what artists, writers and producers can own.

Pop and R&B have become the wild west of rip off artists, and I think it's time to start dropping the hammer on some of the more blatant offenses.

Band Geek

What is Band Geek?

It's me!

I'm a Geek and I play in a Band.  So...Band Geek.  But, seriously, Band Geek is the name of my Podcast.  I've been listening to Podcasts of all kinds for a few years now, and I decided to give it a try.

This Podcast is basically what happens when I hang out with my friends.  We talk about games, movies and comics, and then play music.  I also teach some of the songs we play.

To my knowledge, this is the first Podcast with a house band.  We take requests from Facebook and Twitter and play them live on the show.  This is sort of like what I used to do at the Red Lion when I was playing gigs there.

The Band Geek podcast is available at www.riotcast.com

It's also up on the iOS podcast app.

Give it a listen, hit us up on facebook and twitter.

Thanks!
-Richie

Artemis on the road!

I was reading a bunch of blogs today and then I thought...wait...I have a blog too!

So here I am.  Not sure if anyone reads this considering I do most of my posting on Facebook, but I have a blog, it's here, it works, so I should fill it with words.

Right now I'm in a hotel in Wendover, NV.  We got in last night.  Our show is tonight with Foghat.  Last night, was amazing.  I organized a game of Artemis in my hotel room.  It was incredibly fun.

I'm a little obsessed with Artemis at the moment.  It's probably the best multiplayer sci fi game ever made.  It's simple and kinda lo-fi by some of today's standards, but the game is so incredibly good that you barely notice that you spent most of the time looking at graphs and blips.

I was going to refrain from describing the game on my blog, but I love talking about this game, so why not.

It's a starship bridge simulator.  You can connect up to 36 computers or mobile devices to a single router or you can play online.  I haven't tried online play yet. To be honest I think this game is best played by people in the same room.

You can have 6 stations on each ship.  Captain, gunner, pilot, communications, engineer, science.  There's a main viewer which gives you the space graphics that we all know and love from Star Trek.  The captain gives orders and the rest of the crew has to carry out those orders on their respective control panels.  It's easy to play, but has enough nuance that you can get really strategic with it.

So last night we played a game with Eric, Jules, Andy, and Jimbo from Foghat.  It was really fun. A great time was had by all.

Go here for more info

http://www.artemis.eochu.com

Just Checking In

Hello blog subscribers.  I don't have anything to promote today, so I'll just say hey!

I'm having a really busy month.  I've been playing a bunch of West Coast gigs with BOC and doing a lot of work in my home studio.  I get a lot of calls and e-mails from people wanting me to contribute to their recordings.  I love doing this kind of work.  I can work from home, it's very creative and fun.  Since I'm working from home, the turnaround time is usually very quick.

I have a lot of ideas in my head for future projects, but I've put them all on hold.  I'm getting married next month and there's a lot of things to be done for the wedding, so that takes priority right now.

I can tell you a few of the cool things I'm in the middle of at the moment.  We're nearly done filming Tiger's Fang 10.  This has been the most challenging one yet because it was our first time using a green screen and we made about every noob mistake possible.  Steve and I have been painstakingly going through every frame of these shots.  Not fun.  The movie is looking really good and it's really really funny.

I'm working on an awesome project with some of my students.  I can't say much yet, except that I'm totally blown away by their talent.  This one is going to be jaw dropping!

I've been working on a lot of new music for myself and my friends.  I have a collection of songs that I'm planning to release as digital singles.  They're all done, I just have to polish them up a bit.  I've also been contributing parts to original music for some of my more well known buddies.  Can't say anything about those projects yet.

On the subject of MorningStarlett, we've been kind of stagnant.  Not by choice though.  There just aren't many places for a band like us to play.  The nice thing though, is that the CD did pretty well for an unknown band release.  I've been reading reviews from all over the world and people really love this album.  I'm very proud of the MorningStarlett CD and it makes me feel great that there are people who really appreciate it.

Now onto the important stuff.  This has been an amazing video game month for me.  I got the new Tomb Raider.  I just finished it.  What an incredible game!  Beautiful, exciting, fun...it was right up my alley.  I loved it!

I'm doing the Riddler stuff in Arkham City.  That game is simply incredible.  It's perfect.  Sometimes when I need to unwind, I just put that game on and patrol Gotham.  It's so amazing that I can play it without even touching any of the missions and still enjoy it.

I just picked up Diablo 3.  While the gameplay and the graphics are pretty basic, the multiplayer features make that game great.  Being able to jump in and out of games with your friends whether they're in your living room, or at their own houses makes this a real winner.  It's like a fantasy party game.  Very cool.

I'm also back into comics.  Yes, my nasty habit is back.  I'm currently reading the DC new 52 stuff.  I was resistant at first, but a few story lines piqued my interest.  I'm not current on everything but I've been reading Batman, Detective Comics, Wonder Woman, Huntress/Powergirl, and Justice League.  It's great stuff to read on the plane when they make you turn your phone off!

-Richie

New Fly-Out Rig!

I just built a new super compact and totally awesome sounding guitar rig for fly out dates where I can only bring a limited amount of gear.  If I had my way, I'd bring my Engl Stack and my big rack o' TC gear to every gig, but on fly out dates, that's simply not possible. 

I got tired of being at the mercy of backline companies' amps.  Usually they're ok, but you do get some poorly maintenanced stinkers every once in a while.  I didn't want to chance it anymore, so that inspired this new rig. 

Here are all the gory and geeky details:

1) My signal obviously starts with the guitar.  I use various Ernie Ball Music Man guitars, all equipped with DiMarzio pickups. 

2) This goes into an Audio Technica AEW-4110 wireless system.  This is a really great sounding and reliable wireless.  It's probably the oldest piece in my entire rig.  It's almost 10 years old and still works great.  How many pieces of electronic gear can you say that about?

3) The output of the wireless goes into a TC Electronic Poly Tune.  This is the coolest tuner ever.  You can check the tuning of all 6 strings at once.  This makes it really easy to tune during very short song breaks.

4) From the tuner, we go into the input of a Line 6 Pod HD-500.  That's right, a POD!  I used to be a tube amp purist. So why did I start using a Pod?  As I said before, the unpredictable nature of backline tube amps, made it nearly impossible to get a consistent sound.  Also, since we started using in-ear monitors, we've been able to keep the stage volume way down.  This made it easier to make this transition.  It took me a long period of tweaking, but I finally got the Pod sounding just right.  The HD models in there are very nice.  The effects are also cool, but they too require a whole lot of tweaking.  I basically use 4 sounds:

            A) Clean Fender Twin Reverb with Chorus, Delay and Reverb

           

            B) Slightly overdriven Dr. Z amp with Tube Screamer, Tremolo and Delay

            C) Crunchy Marshal JCM-800 with Chorus and Flanger

            D) Engl Fireball with 2 Delays set to different rhythms and mix levels.

Within each of these presets I have the ability to turn the individual effects on and off as if the were stomp boxes.  I also have the expression pedal set up to control the Delay mix level.  At first I was using the Pod going direct, but I wasn't thrilled with these results.  So, I ended up disabling the cabinet simulation.

5) The Pod's mono output goes into a BBE Sonic Stomp pedal.  One unexpected side effect of turning the cabinet simulation off and only using the Pod as a preamp was the loss of the low end.  Don't get me wrong, the tone was great, but that super low end depth that you get from a real amp, was just not there.  This pedal was the perfect solution to these missing freqencies.

6) From there the signal goes into a Matrix Guitar Amplification G-1000 Stereo Power Amp.  This is a solid state 1000 watt power amp that only weighs 6 pounds!!!  It's stereo, so I run it in mono mode.  I could run my rig in stereo if I wanted, but I find that my being mono is more effective in this particular band.  Buck has a really nice stereo spread on his sound, and I don't want to get in the way of that.  Since I wasn't really loving the sound of the Pod going to direct into my ears, this was a perfect solution.  I got the air moving and I got to have a little bit of stage volume. This power amp isn't as loud as you'd think, but it does give you a pretty respectable stage volume and it's totally fine if you're using in-ears.  I kind of wish the amp had a depth and presence control like other power amps, but the BBE pedal fills that void nicely.

7) The power amp goes into a Marshall 1960 Cabinet. This is the only piece of rental gear I use.  These are usually consistent enough where my sound won't change much from gig to gig.  This gets miked up and then sent to the PA.  I'd say the most important step in getting a good guitar sound through a PA is microphone placement.  Poor placement can totally wreck your sound, no matter how great your gear is.  I place the microphone myself using my in ears to monitor the sound.

So that's my new rig.  It's really small and I'm really enjoying it.

-Richie

The Abbey Road Video

            So, I've lost my damn mind and decided to do another one of these split-screen videos. I have to say that the Bohemian Rhapsody video was more successful than I could have ever imaged while making it.  I'm so honored that so many people have decided to watch it and share it with their friends.  A lot of people have subscribed to my YouTube channel and have been asking me to do another video, so here it is!

http://youtu.be/nxds-5YSWw8

            Ok, Bohemian Rhapsody is my favorite song of all time, so to me, doing that was a no-brainer.  Having been fascinated with that song for most of my life, I pretty much knew the entire thing before I went to record it. This time, I had to pick something that was not only equally epic and fun, but also something that was just as meaningful to me.  Before I get into the technical mumbo jumbo, here's a little back story about my relationship with these songs.  (If you just want to get to the tech stuff, scroll down to WARNING: TECH TALK)

            Since I was a kid, movies have had such a strong influence on me. When I saw "La Bamba" in 1987, that made me decide to start taking guitar lessons. Luckily for me, I was really into the music of the 1950's which meant that I could have an entire repertoire of music with only 4 or 5 chords under my belt. The Ritchie Valens music served as a gateway to the early American rockers like Little Richard, Chuck Berry, Jerry Lee Lewis and Elvis. I was very content just listening to this music and nothing else. That was until I saw the movie "Ferris Beuler's Day Off." There's a parade scene in that movie where Matthew Broderick mimes the Beatles' version of "Twist And Shout."  That blew me away.  It was still 3 chord rock but it was so much heavier than what I was listening to.  I knew my Uncle Phil had all of the Beatles albums in his collection so I asked him if he could make me a cassette of that song. So next time I visited him, he gave me a cassette.  On that cassette he put: Twist and Shout, She Loves You, and I Wanna Hold Your Hand.  Since I was a 50's nut, these songs weren't much of a stretch. However, he also put the entire "Rubber Soul" album on that same cassette. When I listened to that album, it changed my life.  Instantly, my favorite band was the Beatles. I took it upon myself to learn every mundane detail about the Beatles' history and music. My wardrobe consisted of mostly Beatles T-shirts, which were very hard to come by at that time. If you could imagine a time when it wasn't cool to like the Beatles, this was it.  None of the other kids understood the Beatles.  (Just a quick side note: In 1995 when the Beatles Anthology was released, all of the sudden it became cool to like Beatles. Figures.)  My Beatles fanaticism got so intense that I even begged my dad to get me a John Lennon 325 Rickenbacker (which I use in this video.)

            Once I got to High School, the Beatles became standard repertoire in most of my music classes. I was lucky enough to go to Curtis High School which is the unofficial music high school of Staten Island. Our teacher, Lou Mannarino, was also a Beatles nut so he would work a lot of Beatles songs into the curriculum. During my time at Curtis, we got to opportunity to play at Lincoln Center with our school Symphony.  This was a very exciting time. The coolest thing about it was that we were going be doing Golden Slumbers/Carry That Weight/The End as the finale song.  Playing it live was one thing, but getting to play it live with a full orchestra was mind blowing!  With rehearsals for our Lincoln Center concert underway, we were all in Beatles-mode.  We found out that Paul McCartney was going to be on the Oprah show and we managed to get tickets. During a commercial break I yelled out to Sir Paul and asked him if he would play with us at Lincoln Center.  He gave a big grin and said, "sure!"  Now we were all going nuts!  We were on cloud 9. This was like a dream come true. The news was covering the story and it was a big deal. Sadly, Paul's wife Linda passed away shortly after that taping and he wasn't able to attend our concert.

            The concert was a huge success. It was kind of bittersweet since Paul wasn't there, but it was still amazing. We all knew that we were part of something special.

            Later on in college, I had a cover band called Hit Me With It.  One day we decided that we wanted to do all of Abbey Road live. I think we had a gig on a Friday in Staten Island and we wanted to have it ready for that gig. So on Thursday, we went to our drummer's house in Westchester and we rehearsed the entire album. That was all we did, one day. That night we walked into a bar in Westchester. We noticed they didn't have any band playing that night.  We asked if we could play and they let us. We set up and did the whole album live as a kind of dress rehearsal. It was a lot of fun. The next night, we did our Staten Island show and that was also great. In fact, I posted the whole show on my YouTube channel if you want to check it out.

            These are songs that keep popping up at times in my life.  They remind me of good times and great moments.  They are really special to me so that was a big part of why I chose to do them for this video.

WARNING: TECH TALK

            Ok, so I picked this medley to do.  Apart from the sentimental reasons, there are also technical reasons.  First, this song is epic and very similar to Bohemian Rhapsody in structure. (I actually think that Bohemian Rhapsody is probably Queen's version of the Abbey Road medley, but I'm sure there are plenty of people who would disagree.) Second, I wanted an excuse to play with some instruments I've never tried before. And lastly I knew it was something I was going to be able to sing without killing myself.

            Before I get into the nitty gritty. I want to give credit where credit is due.  I did not invent this genre of video.  There is an extremely talented guy who did an amazing split-screen video of Chick Corea's "Got A Match." He inspired me to do my split-screen video. I highly recommend watching this video:  http://youtu.be/Otbe5c2OIxI

            The first thing I did was tempo mapping.  I brought the original song into Pro Tools and mapped out all of the tempo changes. There were a lot of them. This song was not recorded to a click and the tempo fluctuates about anywhere from 2 to 10 BPM from measure to measure. I initially tried to record this to a steady click, but the song just doesn't work that way. I used to think that songs with moving tempos were no good, but after listening to a lot of classic songs more carefully, I realized that many classic songs couldn't exist with a fixed tempo.

            After mapping out the tempo, I tackled the piano. I spent a good amount of time on this. It just wasn't sounding right. Something was missing. I was either playing too much or too little. After a quick internet search, I came across a YouTube video posted by YouTube user, rasboi, contaning the multi-tracks of the Abbey Road sessions.  Needless to say, this was extremely helpful and once I was able to hear the piano isolated, I could figure it out and the part just fell into place.  For the piano I'm using the Mini Grand plug in that comes with Pro Tools.

            The drums were next on my list. This was the next of several roadblocks I would encounter along the way. I called my friend, Damian Scro, and he talked me through the parts. He explained that Ringo is a lefty, so a lot of his fills move in the opposite direction of a righty drummer.  This complicated things for me since my drum skills are not that great. I found this drum part to be much harder than Bohemian Rhapsody. Bohemian Rhapsody was more structured. In this, there's a lot of jamming. I didn't want to wimp out too much on this drum part, so once again, I decided it was best to transcribe the whole thing onto paper. This was really helpful. After many attempts, I finally got a good take of the drum part. I was heartbroken when I went back to check the video footage I recorded during this take and found that it was out of focus. I was so happy with the take that I decided to leave it as is. In the video, you'll notice the drum screen looks weird when compared to the others. This is because I did my best to sharpen it and make it look semi-presentable.  I'm happy to say, that I will not be using this camera anymore after this project.

            The drums were recorded using a Roland TD-6 kit with a Alesis Surge cymbals.  I used this kit as a MIDI controller and recorded that MIDI data into Pro Tools. After that, I sent that data to FXpansion's BFD2 plug in.  To get that Abbey Road tea towel sound, I used very little ambience on the kit.  The room mics were all muted.  I also used BFD2's dampening function to get the drums to sound as close to the record as I could.

            You'll notice there are 2 drum screens. The second screen is a simple kick snare overdub. You can hear it on the original record hard panned to the right.  For that I used Sample Tank.

            Next was the bass track. This was probably the easiest thing to record. I used a Rickenbacker 4001s from the 70s that my uncle and I restored.  There is a long story about the restoration of this particular bass, but I will save that for a future post.  The bass has flat wound strings on it which are crucial to getting that Beatles bass tone.  I plugged that straight into an SSL preamp and used Native Instruments Guitar Rig 4 plug in.  I used their SVT model. I used a pick which is also a crucial part of getting the Beatles bass tone.

            Once the rhythm section was done, I was at a crossroads. Should I just use samples for the orchestra, or should I attempt to actually play all these instruments?  Well, in a moment of insanity, I decided to give the real thing a try. I was able to borrow a trumpet, trombone, violin and cello from friends and family.  My plan was to play each part 3 to 6 times to get that nice natural orchestral chorusing.  Then I would blend it all with a nice reverb and it should sound like a real orchestra, right?  WRONG!

            I started with the violin.  I was so bad at the violin that I couldn't stop myself from laughing during takes.  After 3 hours of playing violin, I managed to finish 8 bars of half notes.  That's 16 notes in 3 hours. They all sounded scratchy and horrendous.  I started to record a double of my 16 note triumph to find that 2 wrongs did not make a right. The double track sounded like bad squared.  I just could not get a useable tone from this instrument.

            I was ready to give up, but then I did some more online research and came across a very helpful YouTube video posted by theonlinepianotutor. In her first lesson she teaches how to hold the bow. At first I though that it was stupid, but then I followed her directions as closely as I could and BAM....TONE!  Granted, it wasn't a good tone, but it was useable.  I was able to produce long tones without the notes getting scratchy and that was a good start.

            Recording the violin part was a long an painstaking process involving many many takes, a lot of editing and pitch correction.  I am playing the parts you hear on the video, but I'm getting a lot of help from studio magic. After I saw how long it took to record ONE violin part, I realized there was no way I would be able to double this 6 times.  I moved right onto to violin 2.

            I will admit that as I went through the string parts, it did get a little easier. I also started to find easier ways to finger things so I wouldn't have to do too much string crossing.  I was able to get a nice tone from the lower strings so I avoid the high strings at all costs. Over the next 3 days I finished the entire string quartet. I gotta say cello was my favorite because the note spacing is closer to what I'm used to. I felt like I was smashing my fingers together to get half steps to happen on the violin.

            Once the string quartet was assembled, it sounded OK.  Not great though.  Only having 4 string instruments with no doubling was not giving me the lush sound I was hearing on the original recording.  It sounded kind of thin and harsh.  I did like the sound of real bowing.  The samples never get that right. I decided to layer my real strings with some samples from the Miroslav Philharmonik plug in. When I got the attack from my real strings blended with the sustain of the samples, it was a really great sound.  It was a sound I couldn't have achieved with real strings or samples alone. 

            I was finally satisfied with the string sound.  After a lot of coaxing and some help from layered samples, it sounded good. Now it was time to learn how to play trumpet.  Trumpet is a cruel instrument.  It was completely alien to me.  Being a guitar player, the string instruments made sense to me.  Brass is a different animal.

            If I was giddy from the sound of cats dying produced by my violin playing, then I was downright hysterical from the sound of elephants farting produced by my brass playing.  I did some more online research and found a few more helpful videos on how to play brass. (Please note, I do not recommend learning this way.  I received formal private music lessons for a very long time when I was learning guitar.) 

            What I liked about the brass is that if you could hear the note in your head, and you knew what valves to press, you could kinda sorta get the note out. I found a good trumpet note chart online and I got to work.  I got better as I went along.  My attacks and release were a bit sloppy, but I was able to hold out notes that were in tune.  I though I had trumpet licked until I got to the high parts.

            To play high notes on the trumpet, you need to make your lips as small as possible and push as much air through that tiny opening as possible.  The high notes killed me. My whole face was in pain. I was lightheaded and had to take frequent breaks.  It wasn't going well.

           

            Finally, something clicked and I just figured out how to do it. I basically let pro tools roll while I played the parts over and over again. When I actually hit the notes, I would use that particular segment and slide that into place.  It's a crummy solution, but it was either that, or no high notes.  In the end, I actually enjoyed the trumpet more than I anticipated.

            Next I moved onto the trombone.  I took a brief crash course online and found a decent slide position chart, compared to the trumpet high notes, this was a walk in the park.  I really enjoyed the simplicity of the trombone's design.  It's a fun instrument.

            I wasn't able to get my hands on a french horn, tuba or a bow for my upright bass, so I had to use samples for those parts,  They're pretty low in the mix anyway.  They mostly act as a pad for filling in the gaps.

            At this point, I was relieved the orchestra parts were done, but due to the nature of how I recorded those parts, there was no useable video footage.  This was a problem I would have to solve later.

            Now the fun part began. Guitars!  For all the guitars with the exception of the Leslie part, I used the following setup.  The guitar straight into an Engl Steve Morse head.  The head was fed into an Engl 4x12 cabinet equipped with Clestion V-60s.  This cabinet was placed in my bathroom and was miked up with a dynamic microphone slightly off axis. The microphone went into the SSL preamp and then into pro tools. The Engl head is very versatile and the EQ works like a studio EQ.  I was able to get pretty close to the tones on the record.  EQ and compression during the mix also got me a lot closer.

            For the Leslie guitar, I once again used Guitar Rig 4.  I used their AC-30 model into their Leslie emulator.  It worked pretty well.

            For guitars I used a custom Ernie Ball Music Man Axis, an Ernie Ball Music Man Silhouette Special, a Rickenbacker 325V59 and an Ibanez AE-30 acoustic.

            Vocals were straight forward.  I used an Audio Technica AT-4033 condensor microphone into the SSL preamp.  On the processing end it's EQ, Compression, De-Esser.  That is sent to a bus that has a frequency selective compressor on it designed to smooth out my voice, which can get harsh in the upper mids. I also put some more compression on it.  I had to put a gate on because I picked up a lot of weird sounds in between words with all the compression. It sounded like I was eating soup between lines.

            The mix was very large and involved. I tried to get as close to the original recording as possible without sacrificing quality. There was a lot of drastic EQ'ing and panning.

            Once the music was done, I had to solve my orchestra problem. With no useful footage recorded, I needed to come up with something. I decided to make a gag out of it and record my own green screen orchestra. This turned out to be another huge challenge.  I really didn't have the right equipment to do this. My room was too small, I was using a green cloth curtain that had a lot of folds and was picking up a lot of shadows, my lights were not the right kind for this and my camera was just not picking up the green correctly. I ended up using an iPhone to record the green screen footage because the green was coming out better on the phone than my lousy camera. My cousin, Phil, helped me with the green screen camera angles. I tried to stay as still as I could while playing along with the track.  If you're a stickler for details and you check all my positions on the orchestral instruments, it should all be correct because I was actually playing along.  (Before anyone jumps down my throat, I know my technique is probably miserable.)

            At first I thought having some HD video from the iPhone would have been a good thing, but I had a hell of a time incorporating this HD footage into my SD session.  I think from now on, I'm going to try to shoot in 100% HD if I can. Once I keyed and masked out all of the green I had to downgrade the quality of the file so I could retain the transparency in my SD session.  By the time I composited all of the musicians over the stage backdrop, the quality was pretty bad.  It also didn't help that my limited skills as a cameraman and light designer produced some very uneven and washy shots. My friend Steve Corn helped me make this footage look as good as possible considering the source material.

            Another big problem I had was that violin 2 kept going out of the frame at it looked like the violin kept disappearing.  I decided to add the conductor to cover up this invisible border.  It covers up the problem spot and I think it's pretty funny too.  I could have just re-shot the violin 2 part, but at that point it was much easier to just stand there and wave my arms around.

            Overall, the lighting was a big problem in this video. In my last videos there wasn't enough light. This one was too bright so I painstakingly tried to match all of the videos in color and brightness as best as I can.  I used Sony Vegas Pro for the video editing.  I really love this program.  It's well laid out and has a lot of powerful tools included.

            All in, the video took about 2 weeks. Although this is much simpler song than Bohemian Rhapsody, this was a much more difficult project. The loose nature of the band tracks actually made it harder to cover.  Plus all of the orchestral stuff was very challenging from a playing and producing perspective. 

            My favorite part of this video was getting to play with instruments I've never tried. I recommend it to all musicians. Especially if you write and arrange music. It gives you a new respect for the people who are great players and it gives you a better understanding when it comes to writing for those instruments.

            My least favorite part was dealing with all of the technical problems that kept happening with the video. Usually the video editing is my favorite part, but because my source material was so inconsistent, it made things really difficult. Next time, I'll spend more time prepping shots. It also wouldn't hurt to learn more about cameras and lighting before my next project.

            In closing, I have to give a huge thanks to my fiancé, Ann Marie. She's had to endure two weeks of horrible violin, trumpet and trombone noises. She's had to hear me listen to this song and watch this video over and over again. She's also been a very good sport about my being completely obsessive over trying to get this thing done. During the scrolling credits at the end, that's her sitting next me.  Thank you Ann Marie!

            I'd also like to thank all of the people who have watched my videos and subscribed to my channel. I am overwhelmed by the positive response I've gotten and I can't say thank you enough.

            Finally, thank you to the Beatles for writing great music and providing a lifetime of inspiration.

-Richie Castellano

MorningStarlett

I've been mentioning MorningStarlett a lot recently.  MorningStarlett is my original band. If I had to describe our style, I'd probably use movies instead of musical terms.  We're like "The Fifth Element" meets "Lord Of The Rings" but in metal band form.  One of our most unique traits is our singer.  Ann Marie Nacchio is our frontwoman, and her range is astounding.  Not only does her pitch range seem endless, but she effortlessly shifts in and out of metal and operatic vocal styles.  It's pretty crazy.

Our album drops on 11/21 and will be available in digital format in most online music stores.  We'll also have physical discs on sale at morningstarlett.com.

We're doing something I've never tried before at our CD release party.  We're playing our whole album live while synced up to a video screen.  It's going to be awesome if it works!

Our CD release party will take place at the Full Cup in Staten Island, NY on 11/21 at 8 PM.

I hope you can make it down there and witness this epic event!

-Richie

Stuff Music Students Should Know

A couple months back I put up a facebook post intended for my private students about what I expected them all to know.  From time to time I would quiz them on some of the things we'd gone over in the past and a few of them put some of those fundamentals out of their brains for good.  So I made a short list of what they should know at all times.

Since I posted this, a lot of musicians have been asking me to post the list again.  I'll re-post it, but I just want everyone to understand a few things.  This is a list I made for some of my students at this particular phase in their development.  For your own musical development, you may need more than this, or you may not need any of this.  There are plenty of very successful musicians who know none of this and have done wonderfully without it.

Here goes:

Chords:  Know all 12...
Major
Minor
Augmented
Diminished
Half Diminished
Dominant 7th (plain ol' 7th)
Minor 7th
Major 7th
Minor/maj 7

By all 12 I mean C, C#, D, D#, E  etc....

The more shapes you know, the better.  At the very least, be able to play one type of closed shape for each.

Of course it helps if you know the neck.  Make a chart of the neck and write all the notes on it.  This will be a good reference.  Don't download this chart.  Make it yourself.  Make a bunch of them by hand.  Each time you make one, you'll learn the fretboard better.

Scales: in all 12 keys (easy on guitar)

Pentatonic Minor and Major in all 5 positions.  Let's be honest. We're gonna spend a whole lot of time playing this scale so it would be really helpful to know it all over the neck.

Blues
Major
Minor
Harmonic Minor
Dorian
Mixolydian

I know I left out some really good scales.  But with these, you'll be able to cover a lot of bases.  It also helps to know these in multiple positions.  I also find it helpful to figure out how to play these scales where they sit on top of the pentatonic position 1.  This way if you panic mid-solo, you can always go back to the comfort zone.

A lot of guys like the 3 note per string scales.  I do too.  Those are great for sequences, but I do find that when first learning a scale a lot of students have trouble improvising with 3 notes per string.

Of course I'm leaving out a whole bunch of important stuff in this list.  Again, please don't take this to be the end-all be-all of lists.  At the very least I hope this is helpful.

Thanks,
-Richie

The Unwritten Rules Of Air Travel

A lot of people have jobs that require them to fly a lot. I realize the last thing anyone wants to hear is someone complain about work, but after a particularly atrocious travel experience, I feel that it's my duty to write about this subject. There are unwritten rules of air travel.  Some would consider these rules to be common sense, but when you put New Yorkers in a confined space for 5+ hours, common sense goes out the window.  If we can't sit in seats for an extended period of time and be civil to each other, how are going to survive the big EMP or the zombie apocalypse? The answer to that question is: We wouldn't. We would eat each other first.

Here are the unwritten (now written) rules of air travel.

1. Middle seat wins.  No matter what.

Nobody likes sitting in the middle seat. If you're unlucky enough to draw the short straw of seating assignments and get stuck in the middle, then the good news is: You get both arm rests.  No matter what.  Window guy has the wall to rest on and Aisle guy can hang over his seat into the aisle as well as come and go as he pleases.  The only small bit of comfort the Middle guy gets is the arm rests.  Don't fight the middle seat person for the arm rests.  That's a total jerk move.

The next set of rules go under the heading: This is a plane seat, not your living room couch.

2.  Your elbows belong at your side, not mine.  (That goes for other body parts as well)

This is a self-explanatory rule.  If you're going to sit in coach, then figure out a way to not jam any of your limbs into your neighbor. I understand that there are also larger people who have to fly, but I'm not talking about that.  In fact all of the larger people I've shared rows with have been very courteous and conscious about the personal space issue.  This rule is addressed to the rude people who just don't care.  Fold your hands on the tray table, cross your arms, sleep like a vampire...do what you have to do keep your body in your space.

3.  Bring a small pillow and blanket, not your entire bed set.

This is something I've been seeing more frequently.  People bring giant pillows, comforters and even stuffed animals on planes.  I'm not talking about children either.  These are teens and adults doing this.  The problem with this is that there's no way for you to keep all that stuff contained to your seat.  Yes, we would all love to be able to snuggle up all cozy on a plane, but there's simply not enough room for that in coach.  If you must bring all that stuff on with you, then you need to spend the extra money and sit in first class.

3a.  Take your winter coat off.

Just like the previous rule, there's not enough room in coach for a giant bubble jacket or similarly large winter coat.  You need to stow that coat overhead, or even better, leave it in your checked bag.  Jackets are OK, as long as it can stay in your seat and not spill over to your neighbor.

4. Shoes + Socks.  Keep them on.  At all times....please!

If someone is sitting close enough to you to be able to smell your feet, then you need to keep them covered. This is going to be controversial, but I'm going to say it.  Sandals and flip flops should be outlawed at the airport. If you just can't stand the thought of having your feet confined for hours, then bring a pair of slippers and put them on before you get on the plane.  DON'T TAKE YOUR SHOES AND SOCKS OFF ON THE PLANE.  That's gross.  I don't care how nice you think your feet are. 

4a. Feet go on the floor.

I'm glad there are some very flexible people in the world, but this doesn't mean you get to cross your legs on the flight or keep your feet up on the seat.  Keep them on the floor. If you're neighbor is in danger of being poked by your little piggies, then you need to adjust your position.  Keep them on the floor and out of sight if possible.

5.  If you can't keep an activity confined to your space, then that is not something you should do on a plane.

a) Newspaper guys are a big culprit here.  This is not the breakfast table.  There's no room to spread out and have both sides of the paper open.  If you're sleeping, these are the guys who wake you up with every single page turn.  It's completely obnoxious.  I saw one guy who had it down.  He had the paper folded so just the article he was reading was visible.  That is a travel pro right there.  

b) If you have a gigantic laptop that requires your elbows to move back and forth, then leave that in the overhead.

c) Certain video games require large motions.  I'm a gamer. I love video games, but I know not to play motion-based games on a plane.  I'm not talking about Wii or Kinect, but certain iOS games where you have to shake stuff over and over again, should not be played on the plane.

Basically anything that forces you to go out of your space should be saved for after the flight.

6. Food: Do's and Dont's

Ask yourself these questions before purchasing food to bring on board:

a) Does it have a strong smell?

b) Is it messy?

c) Does it require more space than the tray table?

d) Will it be disastrous if I spill or drop this? 

If you answered YES to any of these questions, then you should not bring that food on the plane. I had a couple sitting next to me bring a giant plate of buffalo wings on the plane once.  They spent most of the flight with their hands covered in sauce as they sucked the wings down to the bones.  Oh yeah, the bones....  They went in a pile on the tray table next to me.  It was disgusting.  So no buffalo wings.  Tuna is probably not the best choice.  Neither is a pizza pie.  Basically, a sandwich or a wrap is ideal.  Something self contained and easy to clean.  Salads can work too, as long as they don't stink.

7.  Meal time = seat up.

If through some miracle, you get a meal on the plane, bring your seat back all the way up.  If you're reclined all the way, the person behind you will not be able to eat.

8. Your kids....not as cute as you think.

Travelling with children is incredibly difficult.  Most seasoned travelers cut parents a lot of slack. Especially when travelling with infants. If a baby is going to cry, then there's nothing you can do about it.  Most seasoned travelers have noise cancelling headphones to combat this, so it's not a big deal.  However, this doesn't refer to babies.  This is about your little 3 to 10 year old brats who you can't control. If you see the kid kicking the seat in front of him/her or constantly messing with the tray table, then please make an attempt to stop the kid.  I understand that kids get restless, but what irritates me is that most parents to don't even try to control their kids on planes anymore.  I was on a flight recently where there were 3 kids running up and down the aisles for the entire flight. How is this ok?  Have parents given up?  Actually, there was one parent who had an inventive way of settling her child.  They sang songs the whole time!  Everyone on the plane was thrilled with that bright idea.  (this is sarcasm, just in case you weren't sure.)  Everyone understands that kids will be kids, but that doesn't mean the parents shouldn't attempt to keep their kids from kicking, screaming and running around for the entire flight.

8a.  Infant in arms = infant in YOUR arms.

Self-explanatory.  This happened to me only once on a flight.  Usually people are pretty good about this.  There was only one couple who wasn't.  Would you believe that it was the same couple who brought the buffalo wings on board?

9.  Let people sleep.

If your neighbor is sleeping, don't wake them. If a person is sleeping then they're less likely to aggravate you.  Unless their sleeping on your shoulder or you have to use the restroom, I would advise you to let people sleep.  I had a woman sitting next to me, wake me out of a deep sleep to inform me the drink cart was coming.  I know she meant well, but I really wished she hadn't.

10.  Use your inside voice.

Although the plane noise can be pretty loud, the person sitting next to you can still hear you whisper. There's no need to shout your conversation.  If a person is too far from you to hear you whisper, then you can't converse with them.  I've seen couples who both like aisle seats sit across from each other, and then carry on loud conversations across the aisle.  This is pretty rude.  This also applies to pre-takeoff phone conversations.  Everybody has text messaging nowadays.  Use that instead of screaming details about your business into a phone surrounded by strangers who want to put a foot in your mouth.

11.  Standing in the aisles.

Yes, some people start getting cramps and back problems if they sit in one uncomfortable spot for too long.  So they get up for a stretch.  No harm in that.  If you are prone to these kinds of back and joint problems I would suggest that you walk to the back of the plane and hang out in the galley by the restrooms for a bit.  Don't just stand up by your seat.  Aside from blocking traffic, you are doing something far worse.  You are basically sticking your backside in someone's face for an extended period of time.  If you need to stretch, that's fine.  Just be conscious of your surroundings.

12.  Baggage.

They say "one small carry on and one small personal item that fits under the seat in front of you."  Since storage space is so precious on a plane, I've become overly conscious of what other people are bring on board.  In this rare case, I actually agree with the flight attendants.  One of your items should be able to fit under the seat.  I see people bringing on 2 big rolling suitcases, or deciding that they don't want to put their small bag under the seats in front of them.  I understand the benefits of legroom, but if you must have that space under the seat in front of you for your legs, then you need to figure out how to bring one less bag onto the plane.

I'm sure there are more rules if I sit here all day and try to recall every miserable plane experience, but these are the big ones.  Basically, it comes down to personal space, common sense and courtesy.  A plane (especially coach class) is shared space.  Try to stay in your assigned space and avoid doing things that disturb others.  Try to cut parents and middle seat passengers some slack...as long as their not being completely inconsiderate of everyone else.  If you find that you can't follow the basic rules of air travel, then you need to spend the extra bucks and either sit in first class, or buy an extra empty seat next to you.